Ask yourself who actually clicks “About.” Not your happy customers — they’re in the product. Not the person who bounced in three seconds; they never got that far. The visitor on your About page is someone in a very specific state: interested enough to keep reading, and suspicious enough to go looking. They saw the pitch, something in them said hold on, and now they’re running the oldest due-diligence move there is — trying to find out who’s behind this thing before they hand it their money, their data, or their time. They came to that page hunting for a reason to trust you, or a reason not to.
Which means the About page is not a second landing page. It’s a trust page, visited by a self-selected sample of your doubters — and most teams squander it by writing another feature brochure. “Founded in 2021, we’re on a mission to revolutionize the way teams collaborate.” That paragraph answers a question the visitor didn’t bring. They didn’t come to hear the pitch again in the third person. They came to find out if the pitch can be believed.
It helps to be precise about what trust is actually made of, because “build trust” is the kind of advice that sounds true and tells you nothing. The cleanest breakdown from the research splits it three ways. There’s ability — can these people actually do the thing they’re claiming? There’s benevolence — do they have my interests somewhere in mind, or only their revenue? And there’s integrity — are they consistent, honest, the kind of operation that keeps its word when no one’s forcing it to? A visitor decides to trust you only when enough of all three clear the bar.
Look at where each corner gets argued. Your landing page is a machine built almost entirely for ability — the features, the demo, the benchmark, the “here’s what it does and how well.” That’s the right job for it. But benevolence and integrity barely fit on a landing page; they need a person, a story, a track record. Which is exactly the raw material an About page is made of, and exactly what a doubter is there to weigh. So the move is to stop writing it as a mission statement and start writing it as an answer to who are you, really, and why should I believe you.
In practice that means a few concrete things, none of them decoration. Put real faces and real names on it — a skeptic trusts a person far faster than a logo, and a leadership page with actual humans reads as these people are willing to be accountable. Be specific to the point of being checkable: “12,000 teams, including [a named one you can go verify]” beats “trusted by many,” because specificity is expensive to fake and doubters know that instinctively — vagueness reads as hiding. Tell the honest origin, including what you’re not and who you’re not for; a story that admits an edge signals integrity in a way no polished mission ever will. And put the receipts right here — the security posture, the guarantee, the refund policy, the humans who answer support — because a person weighing risk wants to see the floor before they step onto it.
The obvious objection is a good one: our About page gets two percent of traffic, why pour effort into it? Because that two percent is low volume and high intent. The people on it are disproportionately mid-decision, and they’re evaluating the precise thing — trust — that’s standing between them and a yes. Weight the page by intent, not by pageviews, and it stops looking minor. I’ll give the honest boundary too, because this doesn’t apply evenly: trust investment should scale with risk. A three-dollar impulse app barely needs an About page, because there’s almost nothing to lose by trying it. Anything where the user hands over real money, sensitive data, or a long commitment needs one badly, and the higher the stakes, the more of your best writing belongs on the page your most careful visitors go looking for.
So the audit is simple, and slightly uncomfortable. Open your own About page and read it as a stranger who’s half-decided not to buy. Does it answer “what does this do” — again — or does it answer “who’s behind this, and can I trust them with what I’m about to risk?” If it’s the first, you’ve built a second landing page for people who already read the first one and came looking for more, and you’ve quietly skipped the only question they showed up to ask.
Liked this? Get the next one in Working Theory.
Going weekly in August (it's in beta now). One genuinely interesting read on building, the brain, and the science most people missed.